About the International
Society of Scholastics
Society of Scholastics
copyright 2009 by the International Society of Scholastics.
All public material on this website is owned and operated by the International Society of Scholastics. All rights reserved.
All public material on this website is owned and operated by the International Society of Scholastics. All rights reserved.
Full Members of the Society are bound to its ideals and goals, to which the signs of fidelity are enumerated as five principles.
For their adherence to the Scholastic tenets, members of the Society will find available to them numerous educational resources and academic benefits as well as opportunities to actively participate in the formation and sustention of various projects supported by the ISS.
For their adherence to the Scholastic tenets, members of the Society will find available to them numerous educational resources and academic benefits as well as opportunities to actively participate in the formation and sustention of various projects supported by the ISS.
Our Principles
FOURTH PRINCIPLE
Recognizing that we are far removed from the mind of Master Thomas, when a point of contention arises regarding his meaning, one must first and foremost seek its resolution in the consensus of the philosophers of the continuous line of Scholastic Thomists who are recognized as faithfully and intentionally adhering to Thomas’s doctrine. This line includes, but is not limited to, Herve de Nedellec, Thomas Sutton, Durandus of Aurillac, John Capreolus, Cajetan, Conrad Kollin, Sylvester de Ferraris, Francis of Vittoria, Dominic Soto, Melchior Cano, Peter de Soto, Dominic Banez, John of St. Thomas, the Salmanticenses, Vincent Gotti, Salvatore Roselli, Sanseverino, Charles Rene Billuart, Benedetto Lorenzelli, Edouard Hugon, Thomas Zigliara, H.D. Gardeil, Norbertus del Prado, Santiago Ramirez, and Garrigou-Lagrange. This line excludes those who explicitly or implicitly reject the principles, methods, or conclusions of the Scholastic Thomistic tradition and its continuous and organic development.
Recognizing that we are far removed from the mind of Master Thomas, when a point of contention arises regarding his meaning, one must first and foremost seek its resolution in the consensus of the philosophers of the continuous line of Scholastic Thomists who are recognized as faithfully and intentionally adhering to Thomas’s doctrine. This line includes, but is not limited to, Herve de Nedellec, Thomas Sutton, Durandus of Aurillac, John Capreolus, Cajetan, Conrad Kollin, Sylvester de Ferraris, Francis of Vittoria, Dominic Soto, Melchior Cano, Peter de Soto, Dominic Banez, John of St. Thomas, the Salmanticenses, Vincent Gotti, Salvatore Roselli, Sanseverino, Charles Rene Billuart, Benedetto Lorenzelli, Edouard Hugon, Thomas Zigliara, H.D. Gardeil, Norbertus del Prado, Santiago Ramirez, and Garrigou-Lagrange. This line excludes those who explicitly or implicitly reject the principles, methods, or conclusions of the Scholastic Thomistic tradition and its continuous and organic development.
